Jev beats Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite on classifier eval quality and speed
Malte Ubl ran TypeSafe AI's Jev against an existing classifier eval, where it saturated the eval on quality and was 6x faster than Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite.
Jev Router Latency Comparison: 6.18s Median vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash's 3.64s
The post compares Jev Router's end-to-end request latency with nearby Pareto optimal models. Results show Jev Router's median latency was 6.18 seconds, higher than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)'s 3.64 seconds, with the gap widening at P90.
Finally, let’s compare the router’s end-to-end request latency with nearby Pareto optimal models. The results show Jev Router's median latency was higher. It took 6.18 seconds, compared with 3.64 seconds for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max). The gap widens at P90, the slowest 10% of
· 0 likesOpen on X
More like this
Fast row classification in DuckDB with Jev
The author released a DuckDB extension that uses TypeSafe AI's Jev to quickly classify rows in CSV/Parquet files or DuckDB tables, taking about 10 seconds for 1k rows—faster than an LLM and more ergonomic than a classifier.
Classifying 1,018 AI Papers with Jev for $0.08
The author summarized each paper with DeepSeek V4 Flash, then sent the title, summary, and 24 candidate topics to Jev for classification, processing 1,018 AI papers at $0.08 total cost and 256ms median end-to-end latency per paper.
